🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.